Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 30/Puu-Xvi/2018 and Supreme Court Decision No. 65p/Hum/2018 Concerning the Prohibition of Concurrent Positions for Regional Representative Council Candidates (DPD)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v7i2.3100Keywords:
Verdict Analysis, Supreme Court, Constitutional Court, Double jobAbstract
This study aims to examine the differences between the Constitutional Court's decision and the Supreme Court's decision regarding the prohibition of concurrent positions as candidates for members of DPD, as well as the legal ramifications of these differences. This research employs the normative legal research approach, which refers to legal research that refers to written regulations or other legal materials. Disparity between the Constitutional Court Decision and the Supreme Court is the different time for enforcing the ban on candidates for DPD members from political party officials, according to the findings of this study. The Constitutional Court stated that it has been in effect since the 2019 election, however the Supreme Court stated since after the 2019 election. This disparity or difference may be caused by several factors, including: the Constitutional Court's and the Supreme Court's different authorities when examining a statutory regulation; the Constitutional Court's and the Supreme Court's use of different touchstones when examining a statutory regulation; and the judges of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court's differing perspectives when analyzing cases. The absence of legal certainty and the violation of citizens' constitutional rights are the legal consequences of the gap between the two judgements.
Downloads
References
Ardiyan, D., Widodo, H., & Masnun, M. A. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 65P/HUM/2018 Tentang Pencalonan Anggota DPD Dari Fusngsionaris Partai Politik. NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM, 1(1), 12. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/novum/article/view/40877
Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Konstitusi & Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2013). Menegakkan Etika Penyeleggara Pemilu. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Audha, E. M. (2021). Purifikasi Judicial Review dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(2). https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/693
Fadjar, O. R. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Efektivitas Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Journal Presumption of Law, 2(1). https://ejournal.unma.ac.id/index.php/jpl/article/view/339
Hoesein, Z. A. (2016). Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia Sejarah, Kedudukan, Fungsi, dan Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Perspektif Konstitusi. Setara Press.
Huda, N. (2008). UUD 1945 dan Gagasan Amandemen Ulang. Rajawali Pers.
Pangarso, I. S. (2018). Memperkuat Kewenangan Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Melalui Politik Hukum Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Justiciabelen, 1(2). http://journal.umg.ac.id/index.php/justiciabelen/article/view/855/722
Robuwan, R. (2018). Redistribusi Kekuasaan Negara dan Hubungan Antar Lembaga Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 12(1).
Syahrizal, A. (2007). Problem Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 4(1), 115.
Wardani, I. E. K. (2019). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mengawal Prinsip Checks and Balances terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah di Indonesia. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 2(2). https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/2883
Zoelva, H. (2016). Mengawal Konstitusionalisme. Konstitusi Press.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Author retains the copyright and grants Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
