Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 4, 2025
Accepted
August 27, 2025
Published
August 25, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 86 Download : 23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Konflik Gaza yang kembali memanas tidak hanya menjadi isu kemanusiaan, tetapi juga menjadi ajang untuk menguji konsistensi politik luar negeri negara berpenduduk mayoritas Muslim seperti Indonesia dan Malaysia. Kajian ini menyoroti bagaimana kedua negara merumuskan kepentingan nasional serta persepsi ancaman dalam konteks sistem internasional yang penuh dinamika, sekaligus memperlihatkan posisi struktural mereka di kawasan Asia Tenggara. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memahami bagaimana perhitungan struktural dan kepentingan nasional membentuk respons diplomatik Indonesia dan Malaysia terhadap isu Palestina. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi kasus kualitatif dengan analisis dokumen resmi, pernyataan pemerintah, serta sumber akademik yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia lebih menekankan pendekatan multilateral yang legalistik, hati-hati, dan berfokus pada legitimasi hukum internasional. Malaysia justru menampilkan strategi simbolik yang bersifat konfrontatif sebagai wujud solidaritas politik. Empat variabel dalam kerangka defensive realism yaitu posisi struktural, persepsi ancaman, kepentingan nasional, dan kanal kebijakan dapat menjelaskan perbedaan strategi kebijakan luar negeri kedua negara. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis dalam studi hubungan internasional dengan memperkaya pemahaman mengenai perilaku negara berkembang di Asia Tenggara dalam menghadapi isu global yang berkaitan dengan politik, keamanan, dan solidaritas dunia.

Keywords

Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia-Malaysia Gaza Defensive Realism

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Revy Marlina, Syarif Iqbal, Mutiara Jasmine

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sang Pencerah Journal is an electronic journal that freely available. Papers that submitted to this journal are published under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The terms of the license are:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 Creative Commons License
How to Cite
Marlina, R., Iqbal, S., & Jasmine, M. (2025). Kepentingan Nasional dan Strategi Kawasan: Analisis Neo-Realis atas Perbedaan Respons Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia dan Malaysia Terhadap Konflik Gaza. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, 11(3), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v11i3.7534
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Fatih, S. (2025). Indonesia’s Humanitarian Diplomacy in the Midst of Gaza and Ukraine Crises: Narratives, Challenges, and Soft Power Potentials. Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis, 2(1).
  2. Al-Fatih, S. (2025). Indonesia’s Humanitarian Diplomacy in the Midst of Gaza and Ukraine Crises: Narratives, Challenges, and Soft Power Potentials. Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis, 2(1).
  3. Ali, M., Agustian, C., & Sahide, A. (2024). Identity and Foreign Policy: Comparative Studies of Indonesian and Malaysian Foreign Policies in Relation to Israel. UNISCI Journal, 22(65), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-200
  4. Ali, M., Agustian, C., & Sahide, A. (2024). Identity and Foreign Policy: Comparative Studies of Indonesian and Malaysian Foreign Policies in Relation to Israel. UNISCI Journal, 22(65), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-200
  5. Aran, A. (2025). Israeli foreign policy towards Turkey since 2011: From adverse asymmetry to equivalence? International Politics, 61(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00654-w
  6. Aran, A. (2025). Israeli foreign policy towards Turkey since 2011: From adverse asymmetry to equivalence? International Politics, 61(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00654-w
  7. Assessing Indonesia’s Relations with the US After Joining BRICS | FULCRUM. (n.d.). Retrieved June 26, 2025, from https://fulcrum.sg/assessing-indonesias-relations-with-the-us-after-joining-brics/
  8. Assessing Indonesia’s Relations with the US After Joining BRICS | FULCRUM. (n.d.). Retrieved June 26, 2025, from https://fulcrum.sg/assessing-indonesias-relations-with-the-us-after-joining-brics/
  9. Ayun, S. Q., Istifarin, A., Hidayatullah, A. D., & Soleh, B. (2024). Indonesia’s Diplomatic Actions in the Israel-Palestine Conflict. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Tentang Kajian Dan Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism Dan Integrity, 10(2), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v10i2.19605
  10. Ayun, S. Q., Istifarin, A., Hidayatullah, A. D., & Soleh, B. (2024). Indonesia’s Diplomatic Actions in the Israel-Palestine Conflict. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Tentang Kajian Dan Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism Dan Integrity, 10(2), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v10i2.19605
  11. Cingöz, M. (2025). Iran’s Palestinian Policy after Hamas’ 7 October Attack. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(2), 862–874. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1567000
  12. Cingöz, M. (2025). Iran’s Palestinian Policy after Hamas’ 7 October Attack. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(2), 862–874. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1567000
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (third edition). SAGE.
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (third edition). SAGE.
  15. Glaser, C. L. (1997). The Security Dilemma Revisited. World Politics, 50(1), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100014763
  16. Glaser, C. L. (1997). The Security Dilemma Revisited. World Politics, 50(1), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100014763
  17. Heywood, A. (2011). Global politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Heywood, A. (2011). Global politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. IP25033 | Malaysia’s Relations with China and the United States in 2025 - RSIS. (n.d.). Retrieved June 25, 2025, from https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/ip25033-malaysias-relations-with-china-and-the-united-states-in-2025/
  20. IP25033 | Malaysia’s Relations with China and the United States in 2025 - RSIS. (n.d.). Retrieved June 25, 2025, from https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/ip25033-malaysias-relations-with-china-and-the-united-states-in-2025/
  21. Jackson, R. H., Sørensen, G., & Møller, J. (2022). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches (Eighth edition). Oxford University Press.
  22. Jackson, R. H., Sørensen, G., & Møller, J. (2022). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches (Eighth edition). Oxford University Press.
  23. Jamaluddine, Z., Abukmail, H., Aly, S., Campbell, O. M. R., & Checchi, F. (2025). Traumatic injury mortality in the Gaza Strip from Oct 7, 2023, to June 30, 2024: A capture–recapture analysis. The Lancet, 405(10477), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02678-3
  24. Jamaluddine, Z., Abukmail, H., Aly, S., Campbell, O. M. R., & Checchi, F. (2025). Traumatic injury mortality in the Gaza Strip from Oct 7, 2023, to June 30, 2024: A capture–recapture analysis. The Lancet, 405(10477), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02678-3
  25. Karisma, G., & Rachmawati, T. (2025). From Politics to Economic Cooperation: Islam as Identity of Foreign Policy in Jokowi Era. Journal of Islamic World and Politics, 9(1).
  26. Karisma, G., & Rachmawati, T. (2025). From Politics to Economic Cooperation: Islam as Identity of Foreign Policy in Jokowi Era. Journal of Islamic World and Politics, 9(1).
  27. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of Great Power politics (1. ed). Norton.
  28. Mikail, K., Ibrahimian, H., Idi, A., & Hadi, A. (2023). Dynamics of Civil Islam in Identity Politics of Indonesia and Malaysia. Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Lintas Budaya, 7(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v7i2.27677
  29. Musa, M. F. (2024). Malaysia’s responses to issues pertaining to Palestine. ISEAS Publishing.
  30. Pandie, P. (2024). Indonesia’s Gaza Intervention: Prospects and Pitfalls (No. 01524). Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  31. Pratama, R. E. (2024). Indonesia’s Role In Promoting Peace In The Israelpalestine Conflict Through Multi-Track Diplomacy. RECHTSVACUUM:JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1(1).
  32. Razum, O., Agha, H., Davidovitch, N., McCall, T., & Shapira, S. (2024). Gaza Ceasefire: Improve WASH, Promote Cooperation. International Journal of Public Health, 69, 1607412. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607412
  33. Setiawati, S. M. (2024). The role of Indonesian government in middle east conflict resolution: Consistent diplomacy or strategic shifts? Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1304108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304108
  34. Shay, S., & Rosen-Koenigsbuch, J. (2023). Jordan and the War in Gaza. International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT).
  35. Taliaferro, J. W. (2001). Security Seeking under Anarchy. International Security, 23(3).
  36. United Nations For the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2025, June 18). Humanitarian Situation Update #297 | Gaza Strip. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - Occupied Palestinian Territory. https://www.ochaopt.org/content/humanitarian-situation-update-297-gaza-strip
  37. Wajid Ali, Ayesha Alam, & Dr Ghulam Mujtaba Shah. (2025). Assessing the OIC’s Role in the Israel-Palestine Conflict: Challenges and Effectiveness. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), 1957–1966. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i1.505
  38. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.