The Legal Authority of Wiretapping by Public Prosecutors in Investigating Corruption Crimes

Authors

  • Aulia Rahman Ambiya Universitas Khairun
  • Faissal Malik Universitas Khairun
  • Nam Rumkel Universitas Khairun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.5969

Keywords:

Legality, Public Prosecutor, Wiretapping, Investigation, Corruption Crime

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal authority of public prosecutors to conduct wiretapping in corruption cases and to identify the regulatory weaknesses in the implementation of this authority. The research employs normative legal research, a process used to discover legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines to address the legal issues at hand. The normative research approach in this study focuses on three approaches: 1) the statute approach, 2) the conceptual approach, and 3) the comparative approach. The findings indicate that the legal authority of public prosecutors to conduct wiretapping is explicitly stipulated in Article 30C letter (i) of Law No. 11 of 2021, amending Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. However, there are several weaknesses in the regulations, including deficiencies in legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. The weaknesses in legal substance include the absence of specific legislation on wiretapping. The weaknesses in legal structure involve overlapping authority among institutions such as the Prosecutor's Office, BIN, Police, and KPK, as well as the lack of digital forensic laboratories and skilled human resources in wiretapping operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bryandono, B. (2022). Legalitas penyadapan oleh jaksa dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v3i1.7

Dananjaya, I., Dewi, A., & Widyantara, I. (2022). Peranan intelijen kejaksaan dalam pengungkapan kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.3.1.4593.12-16

Fahririn, F. (2020). Kpk wiretapping authority after the revision of undang-undang nomor 19 tahun 2019 about komisi pemberantasan korupsi. Veteran Law Review, 3(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v3i2.2119

Fani Agista Heryani (2023). Perbandingan tindak pidana korupsi di brazil dengan di indonesia. Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, Dan Budaya, 3(2), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.33830/humaya.v3i2.5924

Ghonu, I. (2017). Independensi kejaksaan dalam sistem peradilan pidana di indonesia. Justitia Et Pax, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v31i2.1342

Heliany, I., Andayani, W., & Supriyanto, E. (2022). A juridical review of legality and burden of proof of wiretapping evidence in cases of corruption crimes based on legal regulations in indonesia. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 1(6), 716-727. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v1i6.91

Hikmawati, P. (2018). Operasi tangkap tangan dalam penanganan kasus korupsi (arrest hand operation in handling corruption case). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i1.998

Hutchcroft, P. D. (2002). The impact of corruption on economic development:. Political Corruption in Transition, 115-138. https://doi.org/10.7829/j.ctv1wvncpz.13

Jayanti, D., Usman, U., & Sudarti, E. (2022). Kewenangan jaksa melakukan penyadapan dalam proses peradilan pidana. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 6(1), 668-676. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v6i1.19735

Kurniawan, A. (2023). Implementation of recidivism inmate training in the era of industrial revolutions 4.0. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 5(4), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.4.14

Lamijan, L., & Tohari, M. (2022). Dampak Korupsi Terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Politik. JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia), 3(02), 40-59.

Maula, M. I. (2022). Analisis ketaatan hukum masyarakat mewujudkan konsep negara hukum. De Cive : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(8), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v2i8.1593

Patra, J. (2018). Korupsi, pertumbuhan ekonomi dan kemiskinan di indonesia. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5609

Rusmana, I., Widyantara, I., & Suryani, L. (2021). Kewenangan penyidik kepolisian dalam melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(3), 576-581. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.3.4018.576-581

Salam, S., Gurusi, L., Kaswandi, K., Tonny, F., & Dewi, R. (2024). The Concept of" Austin and Jeremy Bentham" and Its Relevance to the Construction of Indigenous People. Journal of Transcendental Law, 6(1), 32-43.

Salam, S., Suhartono, R. M., Nurcahyo, E., & Bason, E. (2024). Pengakuan Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja: Perspektfi Teori Hukum Kritis. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(1), 721-732.

Salsabila, S. and Wahyudi, S. (2022). Peran kejaksaan dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi menggunakan pendekatan restorative justice. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.61-70

Sekarsari, R. (2019). Legalitas alat bukti elektronik hasil penyadapan dalam rencana penjebakan sebagai upaya penegakan hukum. Jurist-Diction, 1(2), 705. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v1i2.11019

Simon, S. (2020). Tanggapan alkitab terhadap wacana hukuman mati bagi pelaku korupsi. Kenosis Jurnal Kajian Teologi, 6(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v6i1.87

Sosiawan, U. (2019). Peran komisi pemberantasan korupsi (kpk) dalam pencegahan dan pemberantasan korupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(4), 517. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.517-538

Tarigan, M. R., Ablisar, M., Sunarmi, S., & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis upaya hukum peninjauan kembali yang diajukan oleh penuntut umum dalam perkara pidana. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 308-321. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i6.82

Warjiyati, S., Ibrahim, K. M., Salam, S., & Faruq, U. (2022). Complaint Authority for Constitutional Complaint by Indonesia’ s Constitutional Court. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(2), 303-315.

Warjiyati, S., Salam, S., Sybelle, J. A., & Fida, I. A. (2023). The Legalization and Application of Osing Indigenous People’s Customary Law Model in the Legal System. Lex localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 21(4), 853-875.

Wibawa, D. S., Agustian, M., & Warmiyati, M. T. (2021). Pendidikan anti korupsi sebagai tindakan preventif perilaku koruptif. Muqoddima Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Riset Sosiologi, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.47776/mjprs.002.01.01

Widianto, E., Rahmanto, A., & Pawito, F. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of public relations in yogyakarta special region high prosecutor’s office. PRofesi Humas, 8(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.24198/prh.v8i2.52386

Widodo, W., Hamzani, A., & Sudewo, F. (2021). Eradication of corruption in local governments based on cooperation agreements. Journal of Production Operations Management and Economics, (12), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpome12.1.12

Yogi, Y. (2022). Penegakan hukum terhadap operasi tangkap tangan perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 7(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v7i1.12009

Zam, R. (2022). Penyalahgunaan kekuasaan oleh penegak hukum dalam penanganan kasus tindak pidana korupsi.. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s8f4j

Downloads

Submitted

2024-07-15

Accepted

2024-07-20

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Ambiya, A. R., Malik, F., & Rumkel, N. (2023). The Legal Authority of Wiretapping by Public Prosecutors in Investigating Corruption Crimes. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 8(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v8i2.5969

Issue

Section

Articles