Reformulation of the Recidivist Concept in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v7i1.2204Keywords:
Children Against The Law, Protection, Repeat OffenderAbstract
Protection of children against the law is essentially an effort to protect children's rights. This study aims to provide an overview of the meaning of repeated offenders against children and efforts to realize the protection and fulfillment of children's rights in violation of the law. This research is a normative legal research with a legal and analytical perspective. The results of this study indicate that the concept of children as recidivists in juvenile justice has so far failed to provide a sense of justice for children. The criminal justice system for children is underused to protect the rights and future of children as perpetrators and victims of crime. More and more children intersect with the law and even become repeat offenders. According to the Criminal Code and the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, legal protection for children is not clearly regulated in repeated cases. According to Article 7 of the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, children who (repeatedly) commit criminal acts cannot be disturbed. According to Article 488 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrators of the second (repeated) crime are threatened with one third of the sentence.
Downloads
References
Arliman, L. (2018). Prlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Dalam Perspektif Pancasila Dan Bela Negara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 58–70.
Bakhtiar, H. S., Sofyan, A. M., & Haeranah, H. (2019). Criminal Justice System of Children in Indonesia. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 24, 01–07.
Djamil, M. N. (2013). Anak Bukan untuk Dihukum. Sinar Grafika.
Ervariani, D. P., Soponyono, E., & Sularto. (2013). Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana oleh Pelaku Kejahatan terhadap Harta Benda (Studi Kasus terhadap Recidive). Diponegoro Law Review, 2(2), 1–14.
Faisal, & Rustamaji, M. (2021). Hukum Pidana Umum. Thafa Media.
Farid, Z. A. (2007). Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Gultom, M. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak dan Perempuan. Refika Aditama.
Gunarto, M. P. (2009). Sikap Memidana yang Berorientasi pada Tujuan Pemidanaan. Mimbar Hukum, 21(1), 93–108.
Hakim, M. R. (2016). Implementasi Rechtsvinding Yang Berkarakteristik Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5(2), 227–248.
Jatnika, D. C., Mulyana, N., & Raharjo, S. T. (2016). Residivis Anak Sebagai Akibat Dari Rendahnya Kesiapan Anak Didik lembaga Pemasyarakatan dalam Menghadapi Proses Integrasi ke Dalam Masyarakat. Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyaraka, 3(2).
Kaimuddin, A. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Pada Proses Diversi Tingkat Penyidikan. Arena Hukum, 8(2), 258–279.
Kanter, E. Y., & Sianturi, S. R. (2002). Asas-asas hukum pidana di Indonesia dan penerapannya. Storia Grafika.
Koy, Y. I. (2021). Sanksi Pidana Pelatihan Kerja bagi Anak dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(1), 179–190.
M Marlina. (2013). sistem pemidanaan terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana sebelum dan sesudah pengaturan restoratif justice di indonesia. jurnal mahupiki.
Marpaung, L. (2012). Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nuh, S. L., Anzward, B., & Rizqia, G. P. (2019). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Residivis Anak dalam Kasus Pencurian Motor di Kota Balikpapan. Journal Lex Suprema, 1(2), 1–17.
Nur, R., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2017). Model of Child Prisoners Counseling (A Comparative Study in Japan, Malaysia and Indonesia. JL Pol’y & Globalization, 68, 34.
Nur, R., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2020). The Imposition of Sanctions for Children. Hasanuddin Law Review, 6(2), 165–171.
Nur, R., Bakhtiar, H. S., Miqat, N., Darmawati, D., & Mustawa, M. (2021). Model Of Punishment: Juvenile Justice Systems. Jambura Law Review, 3, 35-56.
Nur, R. (2020). Rekonstruksi Sanksi Tindakan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Rachma, Z. D. E. (2021). Pembatasan Diversi terhadap Anak yang Melakukan Recidive. Mimbar Keadilan, 14(1), 74-83.
Rahardjo. (2010). Penegakan hukum progresif. Kompas.
Salam, S., & Suhartono, R. M. (2020). The Existence Legal Certainty of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Indonesia. Musamus Law Review, 2(2), 76-85.
Siregar, B. F. (2016). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan terhadap Residivis Pengedar Narkotika di Kota Yogyakarta. E-Journal Universitas Atma Jaya, 1(1), 1-14.
Wahyudi, D. (2015). Perlindungan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum melalui pendekatan restorative justice. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 6(1), 43318.
Wandoyo. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Ketentuan Diversi terhadap Anak yang Melakukan Pengulangan Tindak Pidana Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(3), 159-182.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Author retains the copyright and grants Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png)
